The 2022 Report includes an analysis of 82 universities, the indirect cost rate they receive from federal subsidies and the indirect cost rate they receive from private financiers such as the Sloan Foundation, the Gates Foundation and the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation initiative. Ten of the schools in the analysis of the Heritage Foundation did not confirm their indirect cost rates for private financiers, leaving 72 complete entries in the report analysis.
Of those 72 universities, the report said that 67 private research subsidies accepted with zero percent of indirect research costs, except the same analysis and finding as in NIH’s notice.
Do you have a tip?
Are you a current or previous employee of NIH, or a scientist who has been affected by this administration? We would like to know about you. Using a work without work, communicate with our reporters safely in the signal in Mattreynolds.45 and Emullin. 06.
The Heritage Foundation report concluded that only three schools in the sample refuse to accept indirect cost rates of private foundations at lower rates than those that negotiated with the federal government. These schools are the University of Alabama in Birmingham, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Michigan.
NIH notice refers to the three schools without identifying the Heritage Foundation as the source of the analysis. He mentions that Harvard required a minimum indirect cost coverage of 15 percent of private financiers and that the California Institute of Technology required an indirect cost coverage of 20 percent. These examples also appear in the Heritage Foundation report.
One of the authors of the report, the senior research partner of the Heritage Foundation, Jay Greene, says he did not participate in the writing of NiH’s notice, but did recognize that a paragraph of NiH’s notification “seems to be a reference to our 2022 “report. The NIH did not respond to britcommerce’s request for comments.
A plan also appears to reduce indirect cost rates in federal subsidies in project 2025, the Plan of the Heritage Foundation of almost a thousand pages for a second presidency of Trump. “This market -based reform would help reduce the federal subsidy of taxpayers of the leftist agendas,” reads the report. During his presidential campaign, Trump constantly rejected any link with the Heritage Foundation and the 2025 project.
Monday, a Coalition of 22 states It filed a lawsuit that defies the legality of the NIH attempt to reduce indirect costs.
Universities say that the limit will hinder their ability to do vital investigation. “The discovery of new treatments slowed down, the opportunities to train the next generation of scientific leaders would be reduced, and the skill of the science and engineering of our nation would be severely compromised,” he wrote Harvard president Alan Garber on a publication on the University website.
Some universities may lose more than $ 100 million in federal funds if the new subsidy limit is maintained. According to statisticsWeill Cornell Medicine brought $ 107 million in indirect costs during 2022, a figure that would fall to $ 23 million if the rate had been 15 percent.