The Interim Inspector General of the Office of Personnel Management has confirmed that the Independent Office is investigating whether any “emerging threat” to confidential information has emerged as a result that Elon Musk agents introduce rapid changes in protected government networks.
“The OIG OIG [office of the inspector general] It undertakes to provide an independent and objective supervision of the OPM programs and operations, ”writes the interim inspector general, Norbert Vint, In a letter Democratic legislators dated March 7, he added that his office is not only legally obliged to analyze OPM security protocols, but routinely does so based on “developing risks.” The letter indicated that the office would bend specific requests issued by Democratic legislators last month on their “existing work”, while initiating a “new commitment” on potential risks in the agency associated with computer systems to which it has been accessed or modified by the Doge service of the United States.
Vint, whose predecessor was fired by Trump in January, is one of the half dozen general inspectors of the general inspectors Instrated by Democrats In the Committee of the Government Supervision and Reform Chamber last month to investigate britcommerce and Other points of sale On Doge’s efforts to obtain access to a wide range of record systems that house some of the most delicate data in the government, including personnel archives on millions of government employees and their families.
“We are deeply concerned that the unauthorized access of the system can be happening throughout the federal government and could represent a great threat to the personal privacy of all Americans and for the national security of our nation,” Gerald Connolly, a democrat of classification of the Supervision Committee, wrote in a letter on February 6.
In addition to OPM, the Democrats have pressed for similar security evaluations in five other agencies, even in the Department of Treasury, the General Services Administration, the Administration of Small Businesses, the United States Agency for International Development and the Department of Education. However, Vint is the only guard dog in any of the appointed agencies he has responded so far, a committee spokesman tells britcommerce.
While in the minority in the chamber and the Senate, the Democrats have little power to carry out effective supervision outside the formal audiences, which the Republicans must convene. During his first term, the Trump Department of Justice issued a guide by notifying the executive agencies that had the obligation to answer the questions of the Democrats.
The Republicans of the Congress have committed to a little girl, if there is a formal supervision of Doge’s work, opting in their place Channel back with the billionaire on the impacts of his antipersonal crusade.
The executive order established by Doge, signed by the president on his first day in office, instructed federal agencies to provide Musk agents “full and fast access” to all unlacified record systems to carry out a purge of “fraud, waste and abuse of the entire government.” However, it became evident that Doge personnel, many of them young engineers with direct ties with Musk’s own businesses, paid little attention to the key safeguards of privacy; Evaluate, for example, mandatory evaluations of new technologies installed in protected government networks.
“Several of the concerns that expressed in his letter touch the problems that OIG OIG evaluates as part of our annual reviews of the financial and IT systems of OPM, and plan to incorporate those concerns in these existing projects,” writes Vint in the letter of March 7. “We have also begun participation to evaluate the risks associated with new and modified information systems in OPM. We believe that, ultimately, our new commitment will widely address many of your questions related to the integrity of OPM systems. “